Which proposition passed in california

One of the propositions placed on the ballot by lawmakers, Prop 16 would mark a return to affirmative action in California after it was banned in when voters approved Prop Under current law, the state is prohibited from considering race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. The mandate of Prop has long been a target of civil rights activists. Prop 16 was placed on the ballot after a contentious debate among lawmakers this summer.

One of two measures involving expanding the vote, this one would allow people on parole to vote. Rules vary by state, but parolees — people who have been released from prison before a sentence ends — cannot vote in California until their term of parole is over. Prop 17 would lift that restriction. This is another measure placed on the ballot by the Legislature.

If this prop passes, year-olds would be allowed to register and vote in a primary election if they turn 18 by the time of the subsequent general election.

For example, if you were 17 at the time of the March primary in California, but turned 18 before the Nov. Under current law, a Californian whose 18th birthday fell after the March primary missed out on an opportunity to choose from a larger field of candidates.

This measure was the last one to make the ballot for the November election, and it has several elements to consider. Prop 19 would allow homeowners who are 55 or older, wildfire disaster victims or disabled to keep their property tax at the same level or a reduced rate when they buy a new home.

The children or grandchildren would only be allowed to keep the low property tax level if the home is their primary residence. Prop 20 asks Californians to make yet another decision on parole law.

This one limits some sentence reductions that stemmed from props 47 and 57 Some theft crimes currently charged only as misdemeanors could be charged as felonies. In fact, it creates two new crimes — serial theft and organized retail theft — that carry jail sentences. Prop 20 also expands the list of offenses that would disqualify an inmate from the parole program. People convicted of misdemeanor drug, theft and domestic violence crimes would be required to submit DNA samples.

Some single-family homes are exempt. The prop also allows local government to place limits on increases when a new renter moves into a property. This ballot box battle has been more than a year in the making, bringing together app-based ride services Uber and Lyft in a unified response to one of the most controversial bills of the Legislative session. When it passed last year, Assembly Bill 5 established criteria that essentially made it more difficult for app-based companies to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees.

In May, the state sued Uber and Lyft , alleging they misclassified drivers as independent contractors under the new labor law.

Fast forward a few months, and voters are being asked to consider Prop However, this approach leaves gaps in privacy protection since many notable privacy failures have come from small businesses.

In this light, a federal privacy law could substantially strengthen privacy standards by placing restrictions on all organizations. In our report, we generally suggest scaling business obligations according to the size and complexity of the covered entity, scope of covered data, and possible privacy risks, with some additional requirements or exemptions for large or small data holders.

This would establish some baseline duties to protect privacy for all organizations, while avoiding an unmanageable burden for smaller businesses. Hahn Broadband Edited by Robert W. Crandall and James H. Alleman Algorithmic discrimination: The CCPA does not directly address algorithmic discrimination, although the CPRA does give individuals the right to opt out of automated decisionmaking.

But, as we wrote in our report , algorithms and machine learning have the potential to use personal information in ways that could harm individuals. This becomes a civil rights issue if algorithms make decisions that could reduce opportunities for a group of people or otherwise violate existing federal or state anti-discrimination laws.

On this emerging privacy issue, a federal privacy law could go well beyond the CPRA by holding businesses responsible for showing that their algorithms do not have a disparate impact. Like its predecessor, the CPRA may renew industry focus on federal legislation that could preempt privacy laws from California—or any other state that may pass a new privacy statute. This gives the th Congress a window to pass privacy legislation before the full effects of the CPRA appear. The stakes will be higher on both sides.

A variety of Democratic-leaning advocacy groups, including organized labor, believe it would. Business groups disagree and are staunchly opposed. Proposition 15 promises cash for schools and local governments.

How Prop. Which businesses would pay more property tax under Proposition 15? Supporters say Proposition 15 would mostly raise property taxes on large corporations. Opponents think the impact would be much broader. Nearly half of voters polled back Prop. The politics and demographics of the state were far different in when such considerations were outlawed with Proposition , an amendment to the California Constitution.

This ballot measure is only nine words long. It would repeal Proposition , allowing affirmative action policies to again be used by state officials. It was added to the ballot by the Legislature , setting up a discussion about systemic racism and inequities at the same time as a national reckoning on these topics. Should California allow affirmative action? Can Prop. Proposition 16 asks Californians to give affirmative action another try.

New poll finds shaky support for Proposition 16 to restore affirmative action in California. UC bans race-based quotas for admissions and hiring, setting limits for possible return of affirmative action. If Proposition 17 passes, it would allow parolees — those released from prison but finishing a sentence — to vote. There is a big difference between probation and parole in criminal justice and, at least in California, when it comes to having the right to vote.

Probation is part of a sentence and often allows those convicted of a felony to avoid time behind bars; parole begins upon release from prison, in advance of when the sentence ends. The California Constitution allows someone on probation to vote but suspends the voting rights of a parolee until parole has been completed.

This proposal , placed on the ballot by the Legislature, would treat both groups of offenders the same and allow a person on parole to vote. Rules barring parolees from voting vary by state, though the trend has been toward restoring those rights. California voters are deciding in the November election whether to approve Proposition 17, which would allow people convicted of felonies who are on parole to vote in future elections in the state.

What you need to know about voting by mail, voting in person and more. If Proposition 18 passes, it would allow year-olds to vote in the March primary, as long as they turn 18 by the November election. This constitutional amendment , placed on the ballot by the Legislature, would allow year-olds to register and vote in primary elections if they turn 18 by the time of the general election in November. At least 18 states have similar laws on the books, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Supporters argue that more of these new voters will get engaged with issues if they can participate in a full election cycle. As it stands now, an year-old Californian whose birthday was after the March 3 presidential primary missed out on the chance to pick the candidates who made it to the Nov.

Proposition 18 would allow some year-old Californians to vote. If approved by California voters, Proposition 18 would allow year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they turn 18 before the next general election. If Proposition 19 passes, it would give continued property tax breaks to Californians age 55 and older who want to move. If approved by voters, this legislatively crafted proposal would allow all California homeowners who are 55 or older to purchase a new home and keep their property tax payment at the same level or a newly reduced rate — depending on the value of the new house.

This expands a long-standing program that is currently available only in a few counties. Older Californians who might otherwise be reluctant to change homes because of high property taxes would receive a new break. Proposition 19 also expands the property tax break to Californians who lose their home to a wildfire, an offer currently limited to other kinds of natural disasters. In , a Times investigation found wealthy Californians — including the heirs of Hollywood celebrities — who charged monthly rents much higher than the annual tax payment.

Most of the resulting revenues collected by narrowing this tax break would go toward local firefighting efforts. Who wins and who loses with California property tax measure Proposition Find voting centers and drop-off boxes in our interactive map. If Proposition 20 passes, it would restrict the option of early parole for more crimes and increase penalties for certain theft-related crimes.

California voters have weighed in twice in recent years to reduce the punishment for crimes often considered less serious than violent felonies. In , Proposition 47 was passed to reduce the penalties for some theft and drug crimes. Both laws have been the subject of intense debate over whether they are the right step toward reducing the prison population and promoting rehabilitation, or a wrong step that has led to more crime by repeat offenders.

This ballot measure would place new limits on the lighter sentences included in Proposition 47 and Proposition It would allow some theft-related crimes to be charged as felonies and it would create two new crimes: serial theft applicable only to a select list of crimes and to defendants who have prior convictions for certain crimes and organized retail theft two or more people involved in some theft crimes within a day period. Both crimes could result in jail time. Proposition 20 also would change the parole law championed by then-Gov.

Jerry Brown by barring inmates convicted of crimes including human trafficking and solicitation from being considered for early release.